| |
Repeat Offender
|
Quote: from DaffyDuck on 10:45 pm on June 13, 2005
Quote: from Repeat Offender on 1:16 am on June 14, 2005
I hope that the more rational members of this forum will understand if I don't reply to Blattsucker.
Oh, Blattsucker, I guess with 'the more rational members on this forum' he must mean us, and pretty much everyone else in this thread - and we certainly do:
- understand that he is tucking his tail and running. Quickly.
- understand that his ego would not allow him to just do the proper thing (leave and not respond), and that he had to underline his intention to not respond.... with a response.
- understand that the irony in his ability at self-immolation is priceless, indeed.
You see, people that intend to punish their antagonist with silence, just do so - they don't announce it over the course of up-teen pages, making sure to repeat their intention to punish you with silence, by screaming it loudly into the room.
This whole exercise seemed more like masturbating with a cheese grater: slightly amusing, but mostly painful.
Mr Duck,
I am so glad that you responded. I knew that you would.
There are so many ways I could have expressed myself, but I chose that one.
When you swing your bat at any passing ball, Mr Duck, it makes you look foolish.
It seems that you are so desparate for support, that you don't seem to mind how low you have to stoop to get it.
As for the rest, The Doctor is in !
The repartee concerning the cheesegrater, imperfect as it is, will nevertheless earn you at least on loyal admirer.
That's unfortunate. It has nothing to do, IMO, with 'politically icorrect', but rather with 'personal immaturity'.
Just my $0.02, of course. YMMV
Indeed, just the cheap retort that has become your trademark. Meaningless, unimaginative, and as artless as it is unsupported.
BTW. Why no reply ?..think literal, all too literal,
"Dr" Duck.
RO
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Attractive Thai Girls
Posted on: 2:37 pm on June 14, 2005
|
|
Blattsucker
|
Manowar,
You (and I guess RO) are missing the point. Take my posts and boil them down to their essence. All I'm saying is that RO has a compulsive behaviour disorder and that he is a total bore. I could not give a rats-ass about his opinions. If he was telling me something was white, I would keep on convincing him it was black untill he would see it my way. Upon which I would tell him it was white again. He was so much convinced of is high intellect that even when I was telling him that he was being played with, it did not register.
Go back to page 5 and 6, take a look at them. Don't even read them. Look at them. It looked like QUOTE HELL in there. So on page 6 I made my sarcastic quote joke. On page 7 Hugh fell for it. But before I could answer RO had pushed the envelope to page 9 with more boring BS and even more quotes. From my point of view Hugh was the best person to let my jokes loose on. Maybe Hugh saw this also and wanted to play along.
I then made an obsevation about RO being Hanibal Lector (or not) that was genuine but hardly insulting since the jokes were obvious. And you ofcourse took a potshot at my sitting duck (Sorry Daffy!). Then again an avalanche of quotes and boring shit from RO. I can not get a word in edgewise until page 10. So here I start to make RO my target not for his opinion that can be right or wrong, but for his constant filling page after page with drivel. Not a joke insight and his insights are a joke.
"If you put your head above that parapet, then you should expect some return fire, but you prefer to cower." Somehow this aplies to others but RO forgot that his head was above the parapet 95% of the time. So I open fire. This annoys Mr. RO and he thinks he can fire back. So I taught him the errors of his ways.
Well the rest is history, or better yet "RO is history".
The lesson he has learned is that if you have something to say, you need to keep the 3 basic rules in mind
1) Be informative.
2) Be interesting. (Riceman is informative, but who cares about the red army)
3) Be funny.
I try to do all 3 in every post. Since rule 3 is totaly beyond RO he should stick to 1 + 2. He did not. He got shot down. Simple.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
And just when I wanted to post this, some stupid git gets back into the battle he was just kicked out of.
And what does he have to say?????
It is realy unbelievable! He must have been to the Mohammed Al Sahaf school of logic.
Great! All bets are now off. I'm now taking bets that I can take him to page 100 without even sweating.
"There are so many ways I could have expressed myself, but I chose that one." And you got beaten to a pulp and then come back for some more beating. Your avatar should be a lemming. Somehow it always boils down with RO that he projects his own problems on others. He choses his words, gets a beating, and it is all Daffy's fault. Now who is in need of a shrink????
He even has the gall to say : "When you swing your bat at any passing ball, Mr Duck, it makes you look foolish."
Just count the balls he has taken a swing at in this thread. It must be a couple of hundred, easily. Probably more then Daffy has made posts in this entire forum.
And he is realy doing himself in with : "Indeed, just the cheap retort that has become your trademark. Meaningless, unimaginative, and as artless as it is unsupported." Now who is famous inhere for "Meaningless, unimaginative, and as artless" drivel?
This guy never learns. Oh, what fun I'm going to have with this sucker.
|
Bangkok Women : Meet Sensual Bangkok Women
Posted on: 3:13 pm on June 14, 2005
|
|
Repeat Offender
|
Quote: from BigDUSA on 1:58 pm on June 12, 2005
RO,
This isn't just any old pussy forum, when you refer to a study. The academic committee needs footnotes to check the veracity of your comments.
BigDUSA
Self appointed Big Head, Academic Committee
BigDUSA,
No, indeed. The data comes from Biology Letters 10.1098. The interesting thing is not so much the frequency data, but that there may be a significant genetic factor, and why that may be.
I don't have the full data to hand, but the "missing" 38% will be betwen the data quoted, but perhaps not within the same confidence limits.
On another topic, I too have found myself wandering, and wondering what the hell I was doing in the pursuit of p4p. Do.dging police, pimps and muggers in strange places
Amsterdammed ? How many times.
RO
|
Thai Girls : Meet Sexy Thai Girls
Posted on: 3:13 pm on June 14, 2005
|
|
Repeat Offender
|
Nice try. Read the last line.
RO
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Sexy Bangkok Girls
Posted on: 3:19 pm on June 14, 2005
|
|
Blattsucker
|
"On another topic, I too have found myself wandering, and wondering what the hell I was doing in the pursuit of p4p. Do.dging police, pimps and muggers in strange places."
Great! An other insight from RO that indicates he is totaly clueless, doing things, saying things that he has no grasp on what so ever.
By the way, "dodging police"???? Are you a criminal to boot? Is there a price on your head? Where can I collect it?
"Amsterdammed ? How many times." As many times as you think neccesary to post drivel.
"Nice try. Read the last line." Ok! "Amsterdammed ? How many times."
Yep! makes sence to me! NOT!!!!!
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Attractive Thai Girls
Posted on: 3:41 pm on June 14, 2005
|
|
DaffyDuck
|
Quote: from Blattsucker on 3:25 am on June 15, 2005
This guy never learns. Oh, what fun I'm going to have with this sucker.
I does liven up things around, and fortunately keps him restricted and limited to this one thread - thus, in effect, you are providing a public service 
Speaking of fun, I have now started to slightly pepper my retorts with direct quotes and references to external sources -- none of which he even remotely has gotten, so far.
I was going to start a betting pool if he's going to respond to your and mine latest conversations, but realize now that the bets should be placed not on 'if', but rather on 'when' (1 hour windows).
Lastly, as to his 'promise' of "I hope that the more rational members of this forum will understand if I don't reply to Blattsucker. " -- yeah, right, like an OCD patient can prevent himself from picking up the sunflower seeds Agent Mulder throws on the floor.
|
Bangkok Women : Meet Beautiful Thai Girls
Posted on: 3:54 pm on June 14, 2005
|
|
manowar
|
I think BS and RO just love getting it on ( with each other). That's ok, we are all enjoying a good fight. But I do have one good advice to all bros who are heads over heels with their experience with TG's : Talk to a local Thai guy or "good" TG's. Preferrably a successful Thai guy/"good" TG. Ask them your questions with regards to "Respect". Afterall, who knows TBG's better ? Us ignorant farangs or their fellow countrymen/women ? Too many of us bros are afraid to find out the truth. Because it destroys their fantasies.
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Attractive Thai Girls
Posted on: 5:49 pm on June 14, 2005
|
|
|
|
Repeat Offender
|
Quote: "Amsterdammed ? How many times." As many times as you think neccesary to post drivel.
"Nice try. Read the last line." Ok! "Amsterdammed ? How many times."
Yep! makes sence to me! NOT!!!!!
No, not that last line, dummy. This one, to The Duck and
posted before your risible disclaimer.
"BTW. Why no reply ?..think literal, all too literal, "
As for your disclaimer, I thank you for the cronological record of your demise. Post hoc denials only confirm what I suspected. I told you it was about perception, didn't I ?
Did you fool me ? Some......I certainly wasn't sure, but a few lures and the scales tipped. Think rabbits, George...
....a little more rope.....
The "rational" post was the endgame.
---------------------
You wrote:-
The times that I lay next to a pro, looking her straight in the eyes while she faked an orgasm with a stumble bum like you, are priceless.
--------------------
Oh...oh....oh..yes...yes....yes....Oh, Blattsucker ! Oh stumblebum! You're priceless !
Little foot soldier Blattsucker, you are dismissed.
Checkmate.
RO
|
Thai Women : Meet Matured Thai Women
Posted on: 6:53 am on June 15, 2005
|
|
Repeat Offender
|
Quote:
Speaking of fun, I have now started to slightly pepper my retorts with direct quotes and references to external sources -- none of which he even remotely has gotten, so far.
I was going to start a betting pool if he's going to respond to your and mine latest conversations, but realize now that the bets should be placed not on 'if', but rather on 'when' (1 hour windows).
Mr Duck,
It is indeed odd that none of your posts reflect your new-found guile. Then, as you say, you have only just begun.
Speaking of fun, I do agree that you are a source of amusement.
The X Files. A TV programme popular with conspiracy theorists and adolescents, I believe. Compulsive viewing for some.
RO
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Attractive Thai Girls
Posted on: 7:06 am on June 15, 2005
|
|
| |
|
