| |
alibaba
|
Oh Oh ... Too much controversy seems to have been generated for nothing ...
In my opinion, all that was required was to put across one's own ideas. I do not think that the purpose was to either sit in judgement over somebody else's point of view or the expressions used.
Why let a simple fun-filled question generate so much passion? After all, in this forum, we share our ideas. And, no matter what, each is an individual in his own right and has an opinion on his own perception of beauty or whatever. After all, "Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder."
So, I suggest, let us respect each other's points on beauty without getting into any controversies.
|
Thai Girls : Meet Sexy Thai Girls
Posted on: 5:19 am on Sep. 29, 2002
|
|
Chompoo
|
MrJoe, the only reason I have repeated myself so many times is because so many have refused to grasp the very simple points that I've made. Here again, you have completely bungled the issue.
This was always one of my basic points and I have not wavered on it. I'll repeat it again so you can add to your list. Almost no one, including the original poster answered the original question!
Is it a bad thing to change the focus of a thread? Not necessarily. If you start off with something stupid and end up finding something useful out of it, then it's a good thing. But if you start off with a valid question "What do you consider a good looking woman?" and then completely change it halfway it's a mess and it has devalued the post. If the intent is to have an intelligent discussion and sharing of ideas then it should probably be somewhat organized. If your point is just to randomly write down whatever thoughts pop into our heads, then that's fine and I'll have a few more beers to numb my own brain to that level.
I do consider a post wasted if it asks a question, starts down one path and then changes course to invalidate and obfuscate what was written previously.
This "startling admission" you mentioned was referred to in my original post (remember the part about "screwing up his own question"?). Perhaps you should go back to detective school. Since you seem to appreciate having things explained to you many times, I'll try again: ABC started out with a question about "looks" and halfway through his post decided to add random other "criteria's".
I don't have "the authority" to change what you post. I do have the authority to point out flaws and non sequiturs, just as you do. Of course, I am on the side of pointing out truth and consistency. You are on the side of politeness and fuzzy language and thought at the expense of succinctness and accuracy; in other words, politically correct.
Never mind if to some, a sense of humor IS sexy, chompoo says this is not valid... On some things you are quite specific i.e. personality and attitude (along with sense of humor) cannot be considerations - they are PC bullshit. Nothing else could be true.
At this point, I'm going to be decidely un PC and risk calling you stupid. I really have no other explanation for why you can't understand this simple concept. A sense of humor can be sexy and even smart can be sexy, but in any reasonable conversation they cannot be considerations when evaluating someones "looks". Why don't we all just start saying, the most beautiful woman in the world is "my GF" (oh wait, nokna already did that); how much more PC (and less useful to the rest of us) can you get than that? Really, what other excuse is there for you being so dense on this one issue? Give me a f_cking break, I shouldn't have to repeat myself so many times.
If you want to pick a bargirl for the night based on her personality, attitude, sense of humor, or even vaginal temperature, that's fine. But don't call it "looks". If we cannot agree to use our language at least with some consistency, then all of our posts are "wasted." Maybe one day on the site we'll have ratings for the quality of the girls in the bars, with categories like "Looks", "Attitude", "Service". Can I ask that you and those you defend don't contribute to this survey?
|
Bangkok Women : Meet Sensual Bangkok Women
Posted on: 1:23 pm on Sep. 30, 2002
|
|
nokna
|
i've always said looks are the first thing you go for.
IF you see a girl and invite her to join you,then you are going on looks.
you cannot know what a girl's personality etc is like until you chat to her.
others may be different,but i do not ask an unattractive to join me.
looks are the first thing,then you get to find about her other good points.
|
Thai Girls : Meet Sexy Thai Girls
Posted on: 2:10 pm on Sep. 30, 2002
|
|
Chompoo
|
See, nokna, that illustrates my point. You posted here an honest, intelligent message that I fully agree with. And we're somewhat wasting it down here in this thread.
Some guys do initially select girls who are less attractive for a lot of dubious reasons (although not all of the reasons are totally without merit). However, most of us initially select the girls we think are hot and then filter them out based on attitude and personality. Doing it the other way (personality first, looks second) takes a lot longer (and is less fun  ).
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Sexy Bangkok Girls
Posted on: 2:27 pm on Sep. 30, 2002
|
|
Dave
|
Chompoo
Without wanting to drag out the debate too long, I do have to agree with yout last point. After all, you cannot get the right "feel " for a girl until you have spoken to her.
With so much choice in LOS, you are hardly likely to ask an ugly critter to join you. So yes we all must be initially attracted by looks. but then the other aspects come into play.
Dave
|
Thai Women : Meet Matured Thai Women
Posted on: 3:14 pm on Sep. 30, 2002
|
|
Chompoo
|
Dave, but those other aspects deserve a huge discussion (in a different thread) of the virtually endless possibilities and complications. There's nothing wrong with sometimes wanting a beautiful, sexy girl with zero personality or intelligence, but who can f_ck your brains out. Sometimes the sex is irrelevant and the companionship is more important. I usually take what comes and make the best of it.
|
Bangkok Women : Meet Beautiful Thai Girls
Posted on: 10:27 pm on Sep. 30, 2002
|
|
MrJoe
|
chompoo,
Thanks for the resonse. As I am REALLY tired of all the hostility and piss contests going on and as I have been a contributor; I am trying a new policy. (For as long as I can stand it  ).
I stand by what I've posted , regardless of how you wish to inerpret it. Now, I will concede that you are right in everything single thing you say and of course you are right to say it. Ý
You win, I lose. Now please leave me out of it.
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Attractive Thai Girls
Posted on: 10:36 pm on Sep. 30, 2002
|
|
MrJoe
|
Oh forgot, to admit you are right again: I AM STUPID.
|
Thai Girls : Meet Active Thai Girls
Posted on: 10:45 pm on Sep. 30, 2002
|
|
Chompoo
|
No, MrJoe, let me apologize. You were absolutely right. In the future when talking about a girls looks I will be sure to factor in her sense of humor and the rest of her personality.
But before we start sucking each other's dicks, let me clarify what I said before. I don't know that you really are stupid, you may not be. But your posts in this thread have certainly been stupid, and that's all I really have to go on.
|
Thai Women : Meet Matured Thai Women
Posted on: 12:40 pm on Oct. 1, 2002
|
|
Tyler Durdin
|
Whether the girl is "attractive" by the norm or you see something about her that you are attracted to (the way she dances, her smile, how she treats others, etc), there has to be some level of attraction initially. Then after you talk to her, you decide if she is "into" you or not and whether you want to go further. I always say "looks attract but personalities keep". Have had some absolute model looking girls before but didnt click and got the starfish experience, and vice, had some girls that wouldnt be considered "10"s but something about them struck me and had an excellent time with them.
|
Bangkok Girls : Meet Attractive Thai Girls
Posted on: 1:44 am on Oct. 2, 2002
|
|
| |
|
